Friday, March 18, 2011

Kill The Bill (week 7)


In my quest to further understand the resent events in our state government I read an article in my research, "Wisconsin budget cut protests, union reactions, news and analysis Gallery," compiled by Justin Bank of the Washington Post staff. The first thing I notice was a photo of what looked like bager fans in a stadium but the caption read; "Wisconsin budget battle: Protesters rally against anti-union bill. An estimated 25,000 protesters gathered at the Capitol building in Madison to protest Republican Gov. Scott Walker's legislation to cut public employees' benefits and eliminate most of their collective bargaining rights." It turn out thousands of protestors have converged on the state Capitol over the past week in responce to Republican Gov. Scott Walker's budget plan, which would strip most public employees of collective-bargaining rights. The conflict could and will escalate in the coming days. Walker issued a warning to state employees Monday that they could receive layoff notices as early as next week if there's no agreement to his plan to roll back benefits for public workers to make up for budget shortfalls. The article later goes on to make a n important statment about Wisconsin being ground zero in the war over the future of all of organized labor. In a n iterview with Ezra Kliein, she give a discription of the current situation that I feel speeks true to the opions of the plublick workers; "The deal Wisconsin made with its state employees was simple: Accept lower wages than you could get in the private sector now in return for better pensions and health-care benefits when you retire. Now Walker wants to renege on that deal. Rather than stiff the banks, in other words, he wants to stiff the teachers - but the crucial twist he's added, the one that's sent tens of thousands of workers into the streets, is that he wants to make sure they can't fight back once he does it.The reason you can't stiff bondholders is that they can make a state or country regret reneging on the deals they've made. They can increase borrowing costs far into the future, slowing economic growth and, through the resulting economic pain, throwing politicians out of office. That gives them power. An ordinary teacher does not have access to such artillery. Unless, of course, she's part of a union." She make a very important point about why teachers are being targeted instead of private companies. What I want to know now is what are good solutions to the budget problems and what were the other solutions considered before this bill was chosen? Furthermore how can these solutions be implemented. The problem lies in the fact that there is no solutions that don't have some sort of negative affects or consequences.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR2011022205319.html

1 comment:

  1. Brian, you posted some really powerful quotes/information and you posed some great questions that I am also curious about. There has to be another option but why didn't they consider it? Why does it seem as if this bill came out of nowhere? Why is it being implemented so fast with so many people in disagreement towards it? I don't get it either. There has to be something else we could do...

    ReplyDelete